Greetings, all--
This post covers not last week (Mardi Gras/Keyword) but the week before last (the avant-garde stuff). So much avant-garde performance sounds utterly stupid, almost a parody, when taken out of context. A woman just sits all day at a table staring at whoever sits down across from her? Get a job, loser! Or: A whole movement based on blurred images? Huh. Half the pics I take are Futurist, and I never even new it!
One of my favorite moments in undergrad classes are when I get to witness students doing a complete 180 in their opinion of a work. They hear about some experimental or avant-garde performance, mock it, and then hear (usually from me) a deep retelling/reframing/explanation of that performance. Then they're silent.
One of those moments happened yesterday in my capstone class. Students were writing about what kind of company they'd like to work for in 10 or so years. One student named Elevator Repair Service. He talked about their current big show, GATZ. GATZ, as you may have heard, consists of a live reading of The Great Gatsby. The whole thing. It is eight hours long.
The class groaned.
GATZ at The Public Theater TRAILER from ERS Theater on Vimeo.
Dr. Fletcher swoops in! Funnily enough, my friend in Scranton (the same friend who invited me up to talk last week) had just seen GATZ. He described it briefly. I groaned. Then he told what it was like to watch it. I'll rely on his retelling here:
The show starts with a guy in an office cubicle, trying to load something onto a PC. We see a projection of his screen. It crashes. He grumbles, sighs, tries again. Bluescreen of death. At this point, my friend said, it's like ten minutes into the show. You wonder if the whole eight hours will be like this. Frustrated, the man rummages around his office clutter and pulls out a book: The Great Gatsby. He starts reading.
As he goes on, office life continues behind him, people coming and going, making copies, chatting. Then, at certain points, characters in the office begin saying lines from the book as the reader comes to them. They seem accidental, natural coincidences at first. Then they become more frequent. Gradually, the life in the office seems to take on features of the novel--or vice versa. It's riveting, moving, dreamlike, exciting. Finally, forty-five pages from the end, the man puts down the novel, looks directly at the audience, and recites the entire final section from memory (apparently the actor used to do this as a party trick).
By the time I finish telling this to my capstone class, they're silent, absorbed. "So often," I tell them, "we go to a two-and-a-half-hour show that feels like it's four hours long. Imagine going to an eight-hour-show that feels like just an hour or two."
They seemed sold on that.
For this post, share a story of some kind of experimental or avant-garde performance you've seen or heard of that went (for you or for others) from That's so dumb to OMG what a great thing.
Post by Tuesday (March 3)-ish. Comment on this post about someone else's post by Friday (March 6).
This is the class blog for THTR 7922, spring 2020 (a performance theory course for MFA students at Louisiana State University). Check here regularly for posting prompts!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Prompt from Victoria!
On Friday, we discussed how traditional clothes is a part of cultural performance. Dresses, t-shirts, hats and other items represent herit...

-
Part of the mind-bending fun of the simulation argument or Jean Baudrillard's notion of simulacra involves exposing ourselves to the fun...
-
For your first blog entry for the class, I want you to provide, explain, and defend a distinction between theatre and performance . Obviousl...
For this blog, I read Victoria's post. She wrote about seeing an experimental theatre piece, 4.48 Psychosis by Sarah Kane in LSU's lab season and going in with expectations that it would be a one-person show, that it was mostly for a paper she was writing, and that it would be a tough play to tackle. Then her perspective changed to "OMG I'm glad I didn't miss it!" These kinds of reactions to experimental art are part of why we do theatre. The fact that people often likely went into the Studio Theatre not knowing what to expect or expecting something specific, then were surprised with the way that the cast and creative team decided to do 4.48 Psychosis, is one of the best reactions one could hope for after sharing their work. I really like that Vicoria shared a recent experience and one that I shared as well, as I was pretty unsure going into seeing the show but left feeling very thankful I got to see the work they did on that show.
ReplyDeleteI LOVE theater like the performance this chick Kate described in her blog, Tamara. First of all I love the name Tamara. Secondly, I love theater that lets you "choose your own adventure." I saw Punchdrunk's "Drowned Man: A Hollywood Fable" while living in London and saw it three times to try and keep up. I honestly still have no idea what happened or why it happened, I got too obsessed with running around and didn't follow a single story close enough. But I found my way into a trailer with an actor and he offered me and my friends a shot of whiskey. It was wild. Is that avant-garde? I don't know. It's certainly novel. What I think is interesting about this post from a theater history standpoint is that it took place in a temple, not unlike the early theater of the Roman Republic. In attempting to be avant-garde this troupe took theater all the way back to it's ritualistic roots. Bacchus would be pleased.
ReplyDeleteI really resonated with Manny's blog post about seeing performance art that pushes boundaries you didn't know were there. The icons in religion can seem so distant and inaccessible and at the same time comforting to their followers. My own experiences in Christianity were full of this difficult paradox of feeling close to and distant from my spiritual figures. The production Manny describes is like a quantum answer to the paradox. It folds the space between the near and the distant bringing separate points to the same place. The description of Mary witnessing the resurrection of Lazarus, but processing it as a crime, and fear for her son, allows the miracle to remain miraculous (distant), and makes Mary very familiar (near). Just reading the description I could picture Mary as my mother, and the mothers of many young men of Color, who fear persecution of their children sometimes just for attracting too much attention. It is an excellent instance of performance exploring spaces in between ideals and emotions.
ReplyDelete