In class, Manny talked about the possibilities that panoptic culture might grant to those who "hide in plain sight," who seek out and find spaces of resistance to the discipline of surveillance.
His suggestion brings to mind a few artistic interventions into/responses to surveillance culture. Consider, for example, the Surveillance Camera Players:
Throughout the late nineties and aughts, this group staged various pieces--from individual signs ("Just shopping." "Minding my own business.") to full-length adaptations of plays like 1984 or Waiting for Godot. They published maps of surveillance cameras in New York City.
In such a world, another response might be to present a false face. Masks are nothing new, of course, but some artists are taking that to the next level, designing wearable projection masks:
One wonders how these kind of masks may interact with fake-face technologies such as deepfakes. The potentials for creative-productive innovation and criminal exploitation are equally ripe.
For this next post, then: show and tell a creative performance response to the attention economy and/or surveillance capitalism. Explain and explore how that response works in and around the disciplines it exists within. Where is the intervention's resistance effective? Where is it less so?
I'm eager to see what you come up with.